gaussian fit Search Results


gaussian fit  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc gaussian fit
Gaussian Fit, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian fit/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
nonlinear curve fit gaussian function  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp nonlinear curve fit gaussian function
Nonlinear Curve Fit Gaussian Function, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nonlinear curve fit gaussian function/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nonlinear curve fit gaussian function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
multi-gaussian fit  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp multi-gaussian fit
Multi Gaussian Fit, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/multi-gaussian fit/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multi-gaussian fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
single-exponential gaussian fit  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc single-exponential gaussian fit
Single Exponential Gaussian Fit, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/single-exponential gaussian fit/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single-exponential gaussian fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
2d-gaussian fit  (wavemetrics inc)
90
wavemetrics inc 2d-gaussian fit
2d Gaussian Fit, supplied by wavemetrics inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2d-gaussian fit/product/wavemetrics inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2d-gaussian fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian fit simulation  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp gaussian fit simulation
Gaussian Fit Simulation, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian fit simulation/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian fit simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian curve fit for pmad and dl gradients  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp gaussian curve fit for pmad and dl gradients
Gaussian Curve Fit For Pmad And Dl Gradients, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian curve fit for pmad and dl gradients/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian curve fit for pmad and dl gradients - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian curve fit function of origin software  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp gaussian curve fit function of origin software
Gaussian Curve Fit Function Of Origin Software, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian curve fit function of origin software/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian curve fit function of origin software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian least-square fit curves  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc gaussian least-square fit curves
Gaussian Least Square Fit Curves, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian least-square fit curves/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian least-square fit curves - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
two-dimensional gaussian fit  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc two-dimensional gaussian fit
Spatial receptive fields in the rd1 Opn1mwR dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) A and B: effective photon flux (mean ± SE) of the background and bar stimuli used for receptive field mapping in the Opn1mwR and rd1 Opn1mwR mice, respectively, with calculated Michaelson contrast (%, mean ± SE) for each photopigment. Note that rod contrast is not relevant for rd1 mice because these animals lack rods at the age of recording. C: heat map for representative single units from the dLGN of an Opn1mwR (top) and rd1 Opn1mwR (bottom) mouse showing change in firing rate (spikes/s; scale at right) in response to the appearance of vertical bars (250 ms starting at time 0; 13° width at 4.5° resolution) as a function of location on azimuth of bar center. D: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) as a function of bar position for the 2 units in C, fit with a <t>Gaussian</t> function. E: box-and-whisker plot showing that receptive field diameter (mean ± SE) for all light-responsive units was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (12.17 ± 0.5°; n = 38 units; green bar) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (9.96 ± 0.3°; n = 48 units; black bar; ***P = 0.0005, unpaired t test). Box shows interquartile range; line in box is the median; cross is the mean; and whiskers indicate minimum to maximum range. F: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (10.1 ± 1.2 spikes/s) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (7.02 ± 0.8 spikes/s; *P = 0.03, unpaired t test). G: response latency (mean ± SE) was significantly increased in rd1 Opn1mwR (177.9 ± 5.4 ms) compared with Opn1mwR mice (112.3 ± 4.46 ms; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).
Two Dimensional Gaussian Fit, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/two-dimensional gaussian fit/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
two-dimensional gaussian fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian line of best fit  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc gaussian line of best fit
Spatial receptive fields in the rd1 Opn1mwR dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) A and B: effective photon flux (mean ± SE) of the background and bar stimuli used for receptive field mapping in the Opn1mwR and rd1 Opn1mwR mice, respectively, with calculated Michaelson contrast (%, mean ± SE) for each photopigment. Note that rod contrast is not relevant for rd1 mice because these animals lack rods at the age of recording. C: heat map for representative single units from the dLGN of an Opn1mwR (top) and rd1 Opn1mwR (bottom) mouse showing change in firing rate (spikes/s; scale at right) in response to the appearance of vertical bars (250 ms starting at time 0; 13° width at 4.5° resolution) as a function of location on azimuth of bar center. D: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) as a function of bar position for the 2 units in C, fit with a <t>Gaussian</t> function. E: box-and-whisker plot showing that receptive field diameter (mean ± SE) for all light-responsive units was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (12.17 ± 0.5°; n = 38 units; green bar) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (9.96 ± 0.3°; n = 48 units; black bar; ***P = 0.0005, unpaired t test). Box shows interquartile range; line in box is the median; cross is the mean; and whiskers indicate minimum to maximum range. F: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (10.1 ± 1.2 spikes/s) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (7.02 ± 0.8 spikes/s; *P = 0.03, unpaired t test). G: response latency (mean ± SE) was significantly increased in rd1 Opn1mwR (177.9 ± 5.4 ms) compared with Opn1mwR mice (112.3 ± 4.46 ms; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).
Gaussian Line Of Best Fit, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian line of best fit/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian line of best fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
double gaussian fit  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc double gaussian fit
Spatial receptive fields in the rd1 Opn1mwR dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) A and B: effective photon flux (mean ± SE) of the background and bar stimuli used for receptive field mapping in the Opn1mwR and rd1 Opn1mwR mice, respectively, with calculated Michaelson contrast (%, mean ± SE) for each photopigment. Note that rod contrast is not relevant for rd1 mice because these animals lack rods at the age of recording. C: heat map for representative single units from the dLGN of an Opn1mwR (top) and rd1 Opn1mwR (bottom) mouse showing change in firing rate (spikes/s; scale at right) in response to the appearance of vertical bars (250 ms starting at time 0; 13° width at 4.5° resolution) as a function of location on azimuth of bar center. D: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) as a function of bar position for the 2 units in C, fit with a <t>Gaussian</t> function. E: box-and-whisker plot showing that receptive field diameter (mean ± SE) for all light-responsive units was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (12.17 ± 0.5°; n = 38 units; green bar) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (9.96 ± 0.3°; n = 48 units; black bar; ***P = 0.0005, unpaired t test). Box shows interquartile range; line in box is the median; cross is the mean; and whiskers indicate minimum to maximum range. F: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (10.1 ± 1.2 spikes/s) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (7.02 ± 0.8 spikes/s; *P = 0.03, unpaired t test). G: response latency (mean ± SE) was significantly increased in rd1 Opn1mwR (177.9 ± 5.4 ms) compared with Opn1mwR mice (112.3 ± 4.46 ms; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).
Double Gaussian Fit, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double gaussian fit/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double gaussian fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Spatial receptive fields in the rd1 Opn1mwR dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) A and B: effective photon flux (mean ± SE) of the background and bar stimuli used for receptive field mapping in the Opn1mwR and rd1 Opn1mwR mice, respectively, with calculated Michaelson contrast (%, mean ± SE) for each photopigment. Note that rod contrast is not relevant for rd1 mice because these animals lack rods at the age of recording. C: heat map for representative single units from the dLGN of an Opn1mwR (top) and rd1 Opn1mwR (bottom) mouse showing change in firing rate (spikes/s; scale at right) in response to the appearance of vertical bars (250 ms starting at time 0; 13° width at 4.5° resolution) as a function of location on azimuth of bar center. D: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) as a function of bar position for the 2 units in C, fit with a Gaussian function. E: box-and-whisker plot showing that receptive field diameter (mean ± SE) for all light-responsive units was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (12.17 ± 0.5°; n = 38 units; green bar) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (9.96 ± 0.3°; n = 48 units; black bar; ***P = 0.0005, unpaired t test). Box shows interquartile range; line in box is the median; cross is the mean; and whiskers indicate minimum to maximum range. F: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (10.1 ± 1.2 spikes/s) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (7.02 ± 0.8 spikes/s; *P = 0.03, unpaired t test). G: response latency (mean ± SE) was significantly increased in rd1 Opn1mwR (177.9 ± 5.4 ms) compared with Opn1mwR mice (112.3 ± 4.46 ms; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).

Journal: Journal of Neurophysiology

Article Title: Visual responses in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus at early stages of retinal degeneration in rd 1 PDE6β mice

doi: 10.1152/jn.00231.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Spatial receptive fields in the rd1 Opn1mwR dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) A and B: effective photon flux (mean ± SE) of the background and bar stimuli used for receptive field mapping in the Opn1mwR and rd1 Opn1mwR mice, respectively, with calculated Michaelson contrast (%, mean ± SE) for each photopigment. Note that rod contrast is not relevant for rd1 mice because these animals lack rods at the age of recording. C: heat map for representative single units from the dLGN of an Opn1mwR (top) and rd1 Opn1mwR (bottom) mouse showing change in firing rate (spikes/s; scale at right) in response to the appearance of vertical bars (250 ms starting at time 0; 13° width at 4.5° resolution) as a function of location on azimuth of bar center. D: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) as a function of bar position for the 2 units in C, fit with a Gaussian function. E: box-and-whisker plot showing that receptive field diameter (mean ± SE) for all light-responsive units was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (12.17 ± 0.5°; n = 38 units; green bar) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (9.96 ± 0.3°; n = 48 units; black bar; ***P = 0.0005, unpaired t test). Box shows interquartile range; line in box is the median; cross is the mean; and whiskers indicate minimum to maximum range. F: peak response amplitude (change in firing rate, mean ± SE) was significantly larger in Opn1mwR (10.1 ± 1.2 spikes/s) than in rd1 Opn1mwR mice (7.02 ± 0.8 spikes/s; *P = 0.03, unpaired t test). G: response latency (mean ± SE) was significantly increased in rd1 Opn1mwR (177.9 ± 5.4 ms) compared with Opn1mwR mice (112.3 ± 4.46 ms; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).

Article Snippet: The spatial receptive field size for single units meeting this criterion was estimated by fitting a two-dimensional Gaussian fit ( R 2 > 0.7) to the relationship between response amplitude and bar position in GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software).

Techniques: Whisker Assay